top of page
  • Paras Sharma


Updated: Jun 16, 2020

Written By: Alok Kumar, Maharaja Agarsain Institute of Management Studies, New Delhi



Out of nowhere, US President Donald Trump has criticized the WHO for what he called its disappointments in the emergency and said he intends to end American financing of the organization. The declaration came as Trump kept on being infuriated by analysis of his reaction to the pandemic, which has been pounced upon as excessively moderate and ineffectual, neglecting to rapidly grasp public health estimates that could have contained the virus. The WHO has called for worldwide solidarity in battling the COVID-19, after the US President Donald Trump's stinging analysis and danger to pull back financing over its treatment of the pandemic. Director-General of WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, was denounced being excessively near China. Experts dread that crafted by the WHO in battling an infection and improving health and healthcare systems around the globe could be imperiled. (1)

The declaration, while expected, is harmful to the WHO. It tosses a few of its crucial health programs—supported to a limited extent by US commitments—into disorder, including the agency's emergency fund to help at-risk nations over the world battle the coronavirus pandemic.(2)

The US president seems to have three significant issues with the WHO. He blames the association for rushing to acknowledge China's information at the beginning of the pandemic and laud China for its reaction, even though they accept that they have proof that China at first concealed the presence of the infection. (3)

The subsequent grievance is that the WHO repudiated a choice the US made on March 11 to close its outskirts to every single outside national who had as of late visited China, Iran, and 28 European nations. In its official suggestions, the WHO forewarned that "forswearing of passage to travelers originating from influenced zones are normally not compelling in forestalling the importation of cases," despite the way that they "may have a basic fiscal and social impact."

At long last, Trump has additionally communicated dissatisfaction that the US pays a curved portion of the WHO's operational spending plan in contrast with China. The US is required to cover 22% of in general obligatory commitments. In comparison, China is relied upon to cover 12% in 2020-21, even though it has a populace of 1.4 billion individuals and a GDP of $13.6 trillion. The US reserves $400 million to $500 million to the WHO every year, Trump stated, taking note of that China "generally contributes $40 million."(4)


The WHO's yearly spending plan is about $5 billion, not exactly a large portion of that of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As a specialized agency of the UN, the WHO's income originates from evaluated and voluntary contributions. Surveyed commitments are obligatory enrollment levy—UN part states are required to pay an offer dictated by their size and riches. Intentional obligations, in the interim, make up about 80% of the WHO's entire spending plan, yet the organization can't rely upon them from year to year. These voluntary funds can emerge out of part states, international organizations, and not-for-profits, and are ordinarily reserved for explicit undertakings. In 2018-19 US voluntary funding to WHO is more than any other country in percentage. It is 78% and 22% by the rest of the world. (5)

But after the Trump announcement As of the finish of March, the US presently couldn't seem to take care of its 2020 tab of $115,766,920 for surveyed commitments. The nation additionally has around $80 million extraordinary from different years.

The WHO can likewise raise assets to manage exceptional public health emergencies. As a significant aspect of its Covid-19 reaction plan, it has requested an underlying entirety of $675 million to help in danger nations through April 2020. As of April 9, it has gotten about $356 million, with another $61 million vowed from different contributors. The US has contributed about 4% of that.


● Founded in 1948 and primarily based on Geneva, Switzerland, it is the UN agency responsible for world public health

● It has 194 member States, and it aims to promote health, nutrition, and keep the planet safe and serve the vulnerable.

● W.H.O involved in vaccine campaigns, health emergencies, and support other countries in medical aid

● W.H.O got the fund by a mix of members fees based on their population and wealth voluntary contributions

● .US provided approx. 15% of its 2018-19 budget – which is more than $400m

● China gave about $86m in 2018-19; the UK offers most of any country except America.

On the off chance that the U.S. pulls its financing from the WHO, the hole could leave other vital public health programs under-supported. In the WHO's 2018-19 budget, the latest one for which information is accessible, huge U.S. commitments went to polio annihilation, expanding access to fundamental well-being and nourishment administrations, and battling immunization preventable maladies. (6)


It's not satisfactory when or the amount of the U.S.' funding will be suspended. In his discourse, Trump said the review would last 60 to 90 days. Probably, said Ian Jhonestone professor of international law at the Fletcher School at Tufts University, this implies the U.S. won't pay the evaluated commitments it owes the WHO for 2020, and stop every single voluntary contribution, including donations to the Covid-19 fund. But at the same time, it's conceivable Trump will choose, when the review is finished, to restore the funding.

The U.S. furthermore, Chinese governments presently show up more keen on inciting each other than participating in containing the harm unleashed by COVID-19. President Trump has taken to calling COVID-19 the "Chinese virus." In contrast, senior Chinese specialists and state media have pushed over the top speculation that the U.S. made the contamination and planted it in China during the 2019 Military World Games of Wuhan. This hatred didn't begin, clearly, with the COVID-19. Specialists on International Politics see that in front of the following election schedule booked on 3 November 2020.


The US and China should begin to stand out in making worldwide stores of medication and supplies for future emergencies. They ought to help out the most exceedingly horrible loss nations, for example, the UK, France, and Italy, to help the worldwide economy for rejuvenation. To wrap things up, instead of news charging one another, these two incredible forces should help battle the pandemic. The US has been a long-standing and liberal supporter to WHO and the world expectation it would keep on being so for the reasons for humanity. It is an ideal opportunity to stand joined together, and we will beat this virus.

Washington and Beijing should trade specialists in a joint offer to create medications and immunization. They have to cooperate to make a new observation and observation framework to contain future viral dangers before they go worldwide and propose universal gauges for readiness and best practices when the following general wellbeing emergency shows up, regardless of where its source lies.


  1. Peter Beaumont and Sarah Moseley, what does the WHO do, and why has trump stopped supporting it?, the,(April, 15,2020, 10:25EDT)

  2. Trump halts which are funding over handling of coronavirus, the Hindu,(April, 15,2020,8:45IST)

  3. Sarah Moseley, health experts, condemn Trump's halting of funding to WHO, the Guardian, (April, 15,2020, 15:27 EDT)

  4. Coronavirus: US to halt funding to WHO, says trump, BBC News,(April, 15,2020)

  5. Annabella Timsit and Amanda she drunk trumps suspension of WHO funding is a disaster for the world's health, quartz,(April, 15,2020)

  6. Alice Miranda Holstein, Trump halts funding to WHO, POLITICO,(April, 14,2020, 6:33 PM)

© Copyrighted Material! Contact the publisher for permissions.
bottom of page